<thead id="kqoxr"></thead>
<blockquote id="kqoxr"></blockquote>
<legend id="kqoxr"><li id="kqoxr"></li></legend>
    1. <sub id="kqoxr"></sub>
      1. <blockquote id="kqoxr"><i id="kqoxr"><noscript id="kqoxr"></noscript></i></blockquote>
        <pre id="kqoxr"></pre>

        91午夜福利在线观看精品,亚洲综合色婷婷中文字幕,亚洲日本欧洲二区精品,竹菊影视欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区,亚洲色在线V中文字幕,国产精品毛片av999999,精品视频不卡免费观看,亚洲全乱码精品一区二区

        英語四級考試閱讀復習指導

        時間:2024-10-11 19:47:08 學人智庫

        英語四級考試閱讀復習指導

          形成天才的決定因素應該是勤奮。下面是CN人才網為大家整理的2017年英語四級考試閱讀復習指導,歡迎參考~

        英語四級考試閱讀復習指導

          2017年英語四級考試閱讀復習指導

          A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid ) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses.

          DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to trove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect.

          The controversy in 1998 stemmed form a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., and Daniel L. Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method cannot properly determine the likelihood that two DNA samples will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate.

          In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K.Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998, however, the federal Bureau of Investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples form various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And, in April, a

          National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation for DNA testing laboratories.

          1. Before DNA fingerprinting is used, suspects____.

          A.would have to leave their fingerprints for further investigations

          B.would have to submit evidence for their innocence

          C.could easily escape conviction of guilt

          D.cold be convicted of guilt as well

          2. DNA fingerprinting can be unreliable when ____.

          A.the methods used for blood- cell calculation are not accurate

          B.two different individuals of the same ethnic group may have the same DNA fingerprinting pattern

          C.a match is by chance left with fingerprints that happen to belong to two different individuals

          D.two different individuals leave two DNA samples.

          3. To geneticists like Lewontin and Hartl, the current method ____.

          A.is not so convincing as to exclude the likelihood that two DNA samples can never come from two individuals

          B.is arguable because two individuals of the same ethnic group are likely to have the same DNA pattern.

          C.Is not based on adequate scientific theory of genetics

          D.Is theoretically contradictory to what they have been studying

          4. The attitude of the Federal Bereau of Investigation shows that ____.

          A.enough data are yet to be collected form various ethnic groups to confirm the unlikelihood of two DNA samples coming from two individual members

          B.enough data of DNA samples should be collected to confirm that only DNA samples form the same person can match

          C.enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to determine the likelihood of two different DNA samples coming form the same person

          D.additional samples from various ethnic groups should be collected to determine that two DNA samples are unlikely to come from the same person

          5. .National Academy of Sciences holds the stance that ____.

          A.DNA testing should be systematized

          B.Only authorized laboratories can conduct DNA testing

          C.The academy only is authorized to work out standards for testing

          D.The academy has the right to accredit laboratories for DNA testing

          答案: CBABB

        【英語四級考試閱讀復習指導】相關文章:

        英語四級閱讀試題參考02-06

        12月英語四級閱讀練習試卷:仔細閱讀12-19

        英語四級閱讀理解練習題01-20

        關于期末考試復習的英語復習方法08-16

        6月大學英語四級閱讀理解題04-02

        中考英語備考指導04-23

        英語四級考試作文萬能結尾句12-08

        四級英語作文模板12-31

        英語四級范文12-31

        關于高考英語作文指導02-02

        主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产丰满乱子伦无码专区 | 国产超碰无码最新上传| 人人做人人澡人人人爽| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠| 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 亚洲情人网| 国产精品免费久久久免费| 久久久久国色av免费观看性色| 四虎国产精品永久在线看| 亚洲中文字幕人妻系列| 性刺激的大陆三级视频| 亚洲成人动漫av在线| 午夜痒痒网| 久久这里只有精品视频66| 日韩精品极品视频在线免费| 91热在线精品国产一区| 亚洲天堂无码| 捆绑av一区二区三区| 亚洲色欲色欲大片www无码| 国产成人黄色自拍小视频| 久久九九精品99国产精品| 99蜜桃臀久久久欧美精品网站| 中文字幕免费不卡二区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av艳妇| 美女网站免费观看视频| 狠狠色综合久久婷婷| 精品国产自线午夜福利| 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合尤物| 亚洲色av天天天天天天| 亚洲小说区图片区色综合网| 免费Aⅴ片在线观看蜜芽Tⅴ| 久久久精品94久久精品| 91免费在线| 黄色Av电影| 亚洲 日韩 另类 天天更新| 中国亚州女人69内射少妇| 国语高潮无遮挡无码免费看| 国产黄色污一区二区三区| 国产精品久久av色网| 国产精品中文字幕第一页| 亚洲鸥美日韩精品久久|